Skip to main content

KnowEase.AI · 15 modules

Evals Engineering Interview Prep
Test & Track Your Readiness

The definitive evaluation engineering track: from metric theory to production eval platforms. Covers benchmark design, LLM-as-judge systems, RAGAS/DeepEval frameworks, human preference pipelines, regression CI for AI, safety red-teaming, agentic evals, RAG evaluation, multimodal eval, synthetic data generation, production monitoring, and building internal eval infrastructure. For engineers who ship AI systems that actually work.. Adaptive checks with dimension-level scoring — not just a quiz, but a readiness signal.

All modules

Eval Engineering Foundations

Beginner

The eval pyramid, offline vs online evals, the 'eval flywheel', why traditional software testing fails for LLMs, anatomy of an eval suite, and how to design an eval-first development culture.

eval pyramidoffline evalsonline evalseval flywheel
~2hTest this →

Benchmark Design & Dataset Curation

Intermediate

Golden set construction, data contamination detection, dynamic benchmarks, slice-based evaluation, distribution shift, human vs synthetic labels, and canonical benchmark critique (MMLU, HumanEval).

golden setdata contaminationdynamic benchmarksslice evaluation
~3hTest this →

Metric Design: Beyond BLEU and ROUGE

Intermediate

Limitations of n-gram metrics, BERTScore mechanics, task-specific metric design, composite scoring, inter-rater reliability, calibration, and when to build custom metrics vs use off-the-shelf.

BLEUROUGEBERTScorecalibration
~3hTest this →

LLM-as-Judge: Architecture & Calibration

Intermediate

Using LLMs to evaluate LLMs: positional bias, verbosity bias, self-consistency, pairwise vs pointwise scoring, calibration against human labels, judge model selection, and when LLM-as-judge fails.

LLM judgepositional biasverbosity biaspairwise scoring
~3hTest this →

RAGAS, DeepEval & Eval Frameworks

Intermediate

RAGAS metrics (faithfulness, answer relevancy, context recall, context precision), DeepEval framework internals, TruLens, Promptfoo, running evals at scale, custom metric plugins, and framework comparison.

RAGASDeepEvalTruLensfaithfulness
~3hTest this →

Human Preference & Annotation Pipelines

Intermediate

RLHF data collection architecture, preference annotation interfaces, inter-annotator agreement (Cohen's kappa, Krippendorff's alpha), annotator calibration, adversarial quality control, and scaling annotation.

RLHFpreference annotationinter-annotator agreementCohen's kappa
~3hTest this →

Synthetic Eval Data Generation

Intermediate

Generating eval datasets with LLMs, quality control via LLM-as-judge, diversity sampling, adversarial synthetic data, contamination risks in LLM-generated evals, and domain-specific synthetic benchmark creation.

synthetic dataLLM-generated evalsadversarial datadiversity sampling
~2hTest this →

Regression Testing & Eval-Driven CI/CD

Intermediate

Eval-driven development (EDD), snapshot eval testing, CI/CD pipelines for LLM changes, regression budgets, flaky eval management, eval caching, pre-commit eval hooks, and golden test suites.

regression testingeval CIsnapshot testingeval-driven development
~3hTest this →

Safety, Red-Teaming & Adversarial Evals

Advanced

Harm taxonomies (HELM, ToxiGen), jailbreak evaluation, refusal calibration, adversarial prompt datasets, automated red-teaming with Garak, Constitutional AI eval, bias benchmarks, and safety eval reporting.

red teamingjailbreak evalharm taxonomyGarak
~4hTest this →

Evaluating Agentic & Multi-Step Systems

Advanced

Tool use correctness, task completion rate, loop termination quality, trajectory-level evaluation, SWE-Bench methodology, TAU-bench, multi-agent eval challenges, and process reward models vs outcome reward models.

agentic evalSWE-BenchTAU-benchtool use eval
~4hTest this →

RAG Evaluation Deep Dive

Intermediate

End-to-end RAG eval: retrieval quality (MRR, NDCG, recall@k), generation faithfulness, answer correctness, context utilization, chunk-level attribution, pipeline-level vs component-level eval, and RAGAS in production.

RAG evalfaithfulnessMRRNDCG
~3hTest this →

Multimodal Evaluation

Advanced

Vision-language eval benchmarks (MMMU, MMBench, SEED-Bench), perceptual quality metrics (FID, IS, CLIP score), visual QA grading, image generation evaluation, audio ASR/TTS metrics, and eval challenges unique to multimodal.

MMMUMMBenchFIDCLIP score
~3hTest this →

Production Eval Systems & Online Monitoring

Advanced

A/B testing for model changes, shadow deployment eval, continuous eval pipelines, statistical significance, user feedback loops, embedding drift detection, and building a live eval dashboard.

A/B testing LLMshadow deploymentonline evaldrift detection
~3hTest this →

Building an Eval Platform

Advanced

Architecture of internal eval platforms, Braintrust deep dive, Weights & Biases Weave, MLflow eval tracking, dataset versioning, eval result storage, async eval workers, cost management, and multi-team eval governance.

BraintrustW&B WeaveMLflow evalseval platform
~4hTest this →

Eval War Stories & Case Studies

Advanced

Real production eval failures: when LLM judges disagree with users, regression blindspots, benchmark gaming, silent model degradation, the 'eval gap', and lessons from eval systems at Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, and startups.

eval failure modesbenchmark gamingsilent degradationeval gap
~2hTest this →

Frequently asked questions

What topics does the Evals Engineering roadmap cover?
The roadmap covers 15 modules including Eval Engineering Foundations, Benchmark Design & Dataset Curation, Metric Design: Beyond BLEU and ROUGE, LLM-as-Judge: Architecture & Calibration, and more. Each module has a scored readiness check with AI feedback.
Is it free to start?
Yes. The first 2 modules are free forever — no credit card needed. Premium unlocks all modules and unlimited checks.
How is this different from reading blog posts or watching videos?
KnowEase measures your readiness rather than just delivering content. You take a check, get scored by dimension, see where you're weak, and get targeted practice — all in one loop.
How long does it take to complete the roadmap?
The Evals Engineering roadmap is designed for 45 hours of focused study. Most engineers complete it in 3–4 weeks of consistent practice.
Do I get a certificate when I finish?
Yes. Completing all modules generates a shareable Certificate of Completion you can add to LinkedIn or share with recruiters.

Ready to test your knowledge?

Free to start. No credit card required.

Start for free →